If the answer is "Not much", what is the question?

Scientists on all sides of the global warming debate are in general agreement about how much heat is being directly trapped by human emissions of carbon dioxide

Science confirms what some have long thought about the crock that is human induced climate change.

the central premise of alarmist global warming theory is that carbon dioxide emissions should be directly and indirectly trapping a certain amount of heat in the earth's atmosphere and preventing it from escaping into space.

Real-world measurements, however, show far less heat is being trapped in the earth's atmosphere than the alarmist computer models predict, and far more heat is escaping into space than the alarmist computer models predict.

When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, show a "huge discrepancy" between alarmist climate models and real-world facts, climate scientists, the media and our elected officials would be wise to take notice.

Whether or not they do so will tell us a great deal about how honest the purveyors of global warming alarmism truly are.

Indeed, I have long suspected such purveyors of snakeoil are only there for the money.

HT KG